ISSN: 2148-8274 / E-ISSN: 2587-0084
, Türk Üreme Tıbbı ve Cerrahisi
Dergisi

Turkish Journal of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery

Dernek Sitesi
Kayıtlı İndexler
ORİJİNAL ARAŞTIRMALAR

Tekrarlayan İmplantasyon Başarısızlığı Olan Hastalarda Euploid Embriyolarin Transfer Zamanlamasının Değerlendirilmesi
The Effect of Immediate Transfer of Euploid Embryos on Outcome in Patients with Recurrent Implantation Failure
Received Date : 17 Apr 2024
Accepted Date : 08 Oct 2024
Available Online : 18 Oct 2024
Doi: 10.24074/tjrms.2024-103497 - Makale Dili: EN
Turkish Journal of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery. 2024;8(3):75-82
ÖZET
Amaç: Tekrarlayan implantasyon başarısızlığı olan kadınların PGT-A uygulanan embriyoların hemen transfer edilmesi ile klinik gebelik oranları arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu retrospektif çalışmaya öploid blastokist transferi yapılan toplam 502 hasta dahil edildi. Her kadın için PGT-A'dan sonra bir dondurulmuş-çözülmüş embriyo transfer siklüsü analiz edildi. Klinik gebelik sonuçlarını pozitif veya negatif olarak sınıflandırarak değerlendirildi. Hastaları kriyo-saklama süresine göre gruplandırdık: 90 günden daha az süre saklanan kriyo grubu Grup A, 90 gün ve daha fazla süre saklanan embriyolar Grup B olarak tanımlandı. Bulgular: İki grup arasında alınan toplam oosit sayısı, metafaz II oositlerin, döllenmiş oositlerin, vitrifiye edilmiş veya transfer edilmiş aşamadaki blastokistlerin sayısı iki grup arasında eşitti. Genel klinik gebelik oranı %77,1 idi ve bu oran her iki grupta da istatistik olarak benzerdi (p=0,747). Grup A içerisinde gebelik sonucu pozitif olan alt grupta 5. gün blastokist oranı daha yüksekti (p=0,001). Grup B için, gebelik sonucu pozitif olan alt grupta daha fazla transfer edilen embriyo sayısı vardı ancak bu grup içindeki hastalar karşılaştırıldığında kriyo-saklama süresi daha kısa olma eğlimindeydi. (sırasıyla p=0,049 ve p=0,040). Sonuç: 90 günden kısa süren öploid embriyo transferi daha geç yapılan öploid embryo transferlerine göre daha iyi bir klinik gebelik oranını vermemiştir. Yumurta toplama gününden transfere kadar geçen süre 90 günü aşan grupta (GrupB) klinik gebelik pozitif olanlarda transfer edilen embriyo sayısı daha fazla olduğu görülmüş ve grup içindeki saklama süresi daha kısa olma eğiliminde olduğu izlenmiştir. Bu bulgular Grup A ve Grup B arasındaki genel sonucu etkilememiştir. Transferin yumurta toplama işleminden sonraki 90 günden daha kısa sürede yapılması durumunda, 6. Gün yerine 5. Gün blastokist transferi daha yüksek gebelik oranı ile ilişkili görünmektedir (p=0,001).
ABSTRACT
Objective: We aimed to investigate the association of immediate transfer of embryos undergoing PGT-A with the clinical pregnancy rates of women with recurrent implantation failure. Materials and Methods: In total 502 patients with euploid blastocyst transfer were included in this retrospective study. For each woman, one vitrified-warmed embryo transfer cycle after PGT-A was analyzed. We assessed clinical pregnancy outcomes, categorizing them as either positive or negative. We grouped the patients according to cryo-storage duration: patients with cryo-storage duration of less than 90-days were grouped as Group A; and the ones with more than 90-days, were included in Group B. Results: The quantities of retrieved, metaphase II or fertilized oocytes, vitrified or transferred embryos, and blastocysts at the stage were comparable between the two groups. The overall clinical pregnancy rate was 77.1%, and this rate was statistically similar between the Grup A and Group B groups (p=0.747). For Group B, the subgroup with a positive pregnancy outcome had a greater number of transferred embryos but a shorter cryo-storage duration and this features did not change the general outcome between the two groups (p=0.049 and p=0.040, respectively). Within Group A, the subgroup with a positive pregnancy outcome had a higher proportion of Day 5 blastocysts (p=0.001). Conclusion: Immediate euploid embryo transfer of less than 90 days do not effect the pregnancy rate. A higher number of transferred embryos and a shorter storage duration may increase the possibility of pregnancy, if cryo-storage exceeds 90 days. Day 5 blastocyst transfer rather than Day 6 seems to be associated with a higher pregnancy rate when the transfer is done in less than 90 days period after the ovum pick up procedure.
REFERANSLAR
  1. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, et al. The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(9):1786-801. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  2. De Rycke M, Berckmoes V, De Vos A, Van De Voorde S, Verdyck P, Verpoest W, et al. Preimplantation Genetic Testing: Clinical experience of preimplantation genetic testing. Reproduction. 2020;160(5):A45-A58. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  3. Bosdou JK, Venetis CA, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF, Kolibianakis EM. Higher probability of live-birth in high, but not normal, responders after first frozen-embryo transfer in a freeze-only cycle strategy compared to fresh-embryo transfer: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(3):491-505. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  4. Wei D, Liu JY, Sun Y, Shi Y, Zhang B, Liu JQ, et al. Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10178):1310-8. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  5. Li X, Guo P, Blockeel C, Li X, Deng L, Yang J, et al. Storage duration of vitrified embryos does not affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1148411. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  6. Shi B, Cui L, Ye X, Ye Y. Long-term cryopreservation and frozen embryo transfer do not impact clinical and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study of slow-frozen early-cleavage human embryos. Zygote. 2022;30(5):712-8. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  7. Li J, Yin M, Wang B, Lin J, Chen Q, Wang N, et al. The effect of storage time after vitrification on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes among 24 698 patients following the first embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(7): 1675-84. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  8. Cimadomo D, Fabozzi G, Dovere L, et al. Clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes after vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer are independent of cryo-storage duration. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;44(2):221-7. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  9. Shi B, Cui L, Ye X, Ye Y. [Effects of embryo cryopreservation and thawing on clinical outcomes of transplantable embryos after cleavage-stage preimplantation genetic diagnosis or screening]. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017;46(3):295-99. Chinese.
  10. Tan BK, Vandekerckhove P, Kennedy R, Keay SD. Investigation and current management of recurrent IVF treatment failure in the UK. BJOG. 2005;112 (6):773-80. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  11. Coughlan C, Ledger W, Wang Q, Liu F, Demirol A, Gurgan T, et al. Recurrent implantation failure: definition and management. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28(1):14-38. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  12. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1999;11(3):307-11. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  13. Chen HH, Huang CC, Cheng EH, Lee TH, Chien LF, Lee MS. Optimal timing of blastocyst vitrification after trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic screening. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0185747. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  14. Gutnisky C, Alvarez GM, Cetica PD, Dalvit GC. Evaluation of the Cryotech Vitrification Kit for bovine embryos. Cryobiology. 2013;67(3):391-3. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  15. Holschbach V, Kordes H, Dietrich JE, Bruckner T, Strowitzki T, Germeyer A. Patient- and cycle-specific factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;307(6):2001-10. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  16. Cui M, Dong X, Lyu S, Zheng Y, Ai J. The Impact of Embryo Storage Time on Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes and the Time Limit of Vitrification: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:724853. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  17. Zhang X, Wu S, Hao G, Wu X, Ren H, Zhang Y, et al. Prolonged Cryopreservation Negatively Affects Embryo Transfer Outcomes Following the Elective Freeze-All Strategy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:709648. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  18. Lin R, Zhou H, Wang C, Chen H, Shu J, Gan X, et al. Does longer storage of blastocysts with equal grades in a cryopreserved state affect the perinatal outcomes? Cryobiology. 2021;103:87-91. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  19. Sekhon L, Lee JA, Flisser E, Copperman AB, Stein D. Blastocyst vitrification, cryostorage and warming does not affect live birth rate, infant birth weight or timing of delivery. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;37(1):33-42. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  20. Reddy NS, Parimala C, Karuppusami R, Mangalraj AM, Kunjummen AT. Effect of Long-Term Embryo Cryopreservation on Subsequent Frozen Embryo Transfer Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2022;15(3):293-9. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  21. Mao Y, Tang N, Luo Y, Yin P, Li L. Effects of vitrified cryopreservation duration on IVF and neonatal outcomes. J Ovarian Res. 2022;15(1):101. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  22. Kermack AJ, Fesenko I, Christensen DR, Parry KL, Lowen P, Wellstead SJ, et al. Incubator type affects human blastocyst formation and embryo metabolism: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2022;37(12):2757-67. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  23. Ji H, Cao S, Ding H, Dong L, Zhao C, Zhang J, et al. Influence of post-thaw culture duration on pregnancy outcomes in frozen blastocyst transfer cycles. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2023;69(1):64-74. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  24. Rao J, Qiu F, Tian S, Yu Y, Zhang Y, Gu Z, et al. Clinical outcomes for Day 3 double cleavage-stage embryo transfers versus Day 5 or 6 single blastocyst transfer in frozen-thawed cycles: a retrospective comparative analysis. J Int Med Res. 2021;49(12):3000605211062461. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  25. Sciorio R, Thong KJ, Pickering SJ. Increased pregnancy outcome after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of human vitrified-warmed blastocysts. Zygote. 2019;27(5):279-84. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  26. Zhang H, Arhin SK, Zhao J, Hou X, Chen Y, Huang Z. Delayed development influences the outcome of different grades of D5 and D6 blastocysts during freeze-thaw cycle. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2019;65(4):1-5. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  27. Desai N, Ploskonka S, Goodman L, Attaran M, Goldberg JM, Austin C, Falcone T. Delayed blastulation, multinucleation, and expansion grade are independently associated with live-birth rates in frozen blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(6):1370-8. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  28. Wu TF, Chen MJ, Lee MS, Huang CC, Ho ST, Cheng EH, Lee TH. Comparison of clinical outcome between day 5 and day 6 single blastocyst transfers in cycles undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;62(3):429-33. [Crossref]  [PubMed]