ISSN: 2148-8274 / E-ISSN: 2587-0084
, Türk Üreme Tıbbı ve Cerrahisi
Dergisi

Turkish Journal of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery

Dernek Sitesi
Kayıtlı İndexler
ORİJİNAL ARAŞTIRMALAR

İlk Trimester Gebelik Kayıplarını Öngörmede Ultrasonografinin Yeri
The Role of Ultrasonography in Predicting First Trimester Pregnancy Loss
Received Date : 25 Oct 2023
Accepted Date : 14 Nov 2024
Available Online : 20 Nov 2024
Doi: 10.24074/tjrms.2023-100084 - Makale Dili: EN
Turkish Journal of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery. 2024;8(3):69-74
ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı gebeliğin 6-7.haftasındaki sonografik bulgulara göre gestasyonel kese (GS), yolk kesesi (YS), fetal kalp hızı ve desidual kalınlığının abortus riskini belirlemedeki prediktif değerini saptamaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Hastanemize Mart 2018‐2023 tarihleri arasında başvuran, gebeliğin 6-7.haftasında olan 20-45 yaş arası 108 hasta çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Kronik hastalık, tekrarlayan düşük öyküsü, uterin anomali, genetik hastalık öyküsü, çoğul gebeliği olanlar çalışmaya alınmamıştır. Hastaların verileri hastane veritabanından retrospektif elde edilmiştir. Abortus yapan olgularla gebelikleri devam eden olguların parametreleri karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular: Katılımcıların yaşına göre abortus varlığı arasında anlamlı farklılık saptanmamıştır (p=0.643). Abortus yapan hastaların GS çapı, CRL ölçümü anlamlı olarak düşük saptanmıştır (p<0.001, p=0.007 sırasıyla). Abortus yapan hastaların desidual kalınlığı ve progesteron düzeyleri anlamlı olarak düşük saptanmıştır (p=0.028, p<0.001 sırasıyla). Abortus yapan hastaların YS çapı anlamlı olarak yüksek saptanmıştır (p=0.002). Sonuç: Gebeliğin 6-7.haftalarında YS çapının ve morfolojisinin, GS çapının, CRL ölçümünün, desiduel kalınlığının ve progesteron seviyesinin gebelik prognozunu öngörmede anlamlı olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. İlk trimester gebelik kayıplarını öngörmede ultrasonografini parametrelerinin değerlendirilmesi, gebelik prognozunu öngörmede ve hastaya buna yönelik danışmanlık verilmesinde anlamlı olabileceği çalışmamız verileri ışığında önerilmektedir.
ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the predictive value of gestational sac (GS), yolk sac (YS), Crown rump length (CRL) measurement, fetal heart rate (FHR) and decidual thickness in determining the risk of miscarriage, according to sonographic findings at the 6-7th week of pregnancy. Materials and Methods: 108 patients aged 20-45, who were in the 6-7th week of pregnancy and who were admitted to our hospital between March 2018-2023, were included in the study. Those with chronic disease, history of recurrent miscarriage, uterine anomaly, history of genetic disease, and multiple pregnancy were not included in the study. The patients' data were obtained retrospectively from the hospital database. The parameters of cases who had abortions and cases whose pregnancies continued were compared. Results: There was no significant difference in the presence of abortion according to the age of the participants (p=0.643). GS diameter and CRL measurement were found to be significantly lower in patients who had an abortion (p<0.001, p=0.007, respectively). The decidual thickness and progesterone levels of patients who had an abortion were found to be significantly lower (p=0.028, p<0.001, respectively). The YS diameter of patients who had an abortion was found to be significantly higher (p=0.002). Conclusion: It was concluded that YS diameter and morphology, GS diameter, CRL measurement, decidual thickness and progesterone level at the 6th-7th weeks of pregnancy are significant in predicting pregnancy prognosis. In the light of our study data, it is suggested that evaluation of ultrasonography parameters in predicting first trimester pregnancy losses may be meaningful in predicting pregnancy prognosis and providing counseling to the patient.
REFERANSLAR
  1. Lavoué V, Huchon C, Deffieux X, Voltzenlogel MC, Vandenbroucke L, Levêque J. French guidelines for diagnostic criteria for nonviable pregnancy early in the first trimester and for management of threatened miscarriage and nonviable pregnancy (except uterine evacuation). J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2014;43(10):776-93. French.
  2. Park KE, Latack KR, Vestal NL, Ingles SA, Paulson RJ, Awadalla MS. Association of HCG Level with Ultrasound Visualization of the Gestational Sac in Early Viable Pregnancies. Reprod Sci. 2023;30(12):3623-8.. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  3. Ouyang Y, Qin J, Lin G, Xiang S, Li X. Reference intervals of gestational sac, yolk sac, embryonic length, embryonic heart rate at 6-10 weeks after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):533. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  4. Li X, Ouyang Y, Yi Y, Tan Y, Lu G. Correlation analysis between ultrasound findings and abnormal karyotypes in the embryos from early pregnancy loss after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(1):43-50. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  5. Lei W, Yang ZM. [Molecular regulatory network in embryo implantation]. Sheng Li Ke Xue Jin Zhan. 2010;41(6):417-22. Chinese.
  6. Huang J, Zhu W, Tang J, Saravelos SH, Poon LCY, Li TC. Do specific ultrasonography features identified at the time of early pregnancy loss predict fetal chromosomal abnormality? - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Genes Dis. 2018;6(2):129-37. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  7. Kapfhamer JD, Palaniappan S, Summers K, Kassel K, Mancuso AC, Ryan GL, Shah DK. Difference between mean gestational sac diameter and crown-rump length as a marker of first-trimester pregnancy loss after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(1):130-6. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  8. Jauniaux E, Johns J, Burton GJ. The role of ultrasound imaging in diagnosing and investigating early pregnancy failure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25(6):613-24. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  9. Çetin Pelit F, Yılmaz H, Süer N.- ilk Trimester Gebelik Kayıplarını Öngörmede Ultrasonografinin Yeri - Perinatoloji Dergisi. 2011;19(1):6-9 [Crossref] 
  10. Oh JS, Wright G, Coulam CB. Gestational sac diameter in very early pregnancy as a predictor of fetal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;20(3):267-9. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  11. Stampone C, Nicotra M, Muttinelli C, Cosmi EV. Transvaginal sonography of the yolk sac in normal and abnormal pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound. 1996;24(1):3-9. [Crossref] 
  12. Varelas FK, Prapas NM, Liang RI, Prapas IM, Makedos GA. Yolk sac size and embryonic heart rate as prognostic factors of first trimester pregnancy outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;138(1):10-3. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  13. Lindsay DJ, Lovett IS, Lyons EA, Levi CS, Zheng XH, Holt SC, Dashefsky SM. Yolk sac diameter and shape at endovaginal US: predictors of pregnancy outcome in the first trimester. Radiology. 1992;183(1):115-8. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  14. Cho FN, Chen SN, Tai MH, Yang TL. The quality and size of yolk sac in early pregnancy loss. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;46(5):413-8. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  15. Achiron R, Tadmor O, Mashiach S. Heart rate as a predictor of first-trimester spontaneous abortion after ultrasound-proven viability. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78(3 Pt 1):330-4. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  16. Theodor S, Dimitrios E, Alexander S, George Z. Embryonic heart rate in early pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound. 1997;26:33-6 [Crossref] 
  17. Bajo J, Moreno-Calvo FJ, Martinez-Cortes L. Is trophoblastic thickness at the embryonic implantation site a new sign of negative evolution in first trimester pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1629-30. [Crossref]  [PubMed]